Ezra
Pound’s short poem displays a clear, imagist work presenting the image of faces
on a crowded metro train. Pound’s short story is unique, and explicit due to the
simple, mirrored image depicted. The form is unique due to the poem itself
being only two short lines long, but when including the title “In a Station of
the Metro”, Pound’s poem is described as a haiku. The short three lines create
the clear image of people within a metro, and capture the qualities of a haiku
by mirroring the faces to a scene connected to spring. The line “Petals on a
wet, black bough” make the reader think of spring, due to the branch being wet,
possibly from rain, and being that the branches have petals, the reader can
conclude that it may be springtime. The importance of spring associates with
seasons being incorporated with haikus. Based upon Lowell’s rules of imagism, Pound
creates a new rhythm that does not “merely echo old moods”. His haiku styled
poem creates a new rhythm using short lines that flow smoothly, and generate
new emotions within the reader.
Through the simplicity of Pound’s lines, the reader is
able to understand the simple scene of people in a metro station on a train,
but understand the complexity of the many different faces. Pound compares the “faces
in the crowd” (1) to “petals”, signifying that the many faces are all beautiful
and unique because the reader can connect these characteristics to petals. Lowell
explains that an Imagist must “use the language of common speech, but to employ
the exact word…”, meaning that the imagist work should contain only words of
value and meaning to the image the poet is trying to present to the readers.
Pound follows this rule by using words such as “petals”, and “wet” to capture
the faces of the passengers, and the dampness of the underground station. Pound
also uses the word “apparition”, which can mean having a ghostly appearance, or
remarkable, unexpected appearance. Both meanings apply to the scene because as
the passengers shift and crowd onto the train, and as it moves, their faces
blur like that of a ghost. The faces also have a remarkable appearance because
he finds them all uniquely beautiful, based on his comparison to flower petals.
Pound presents two clear images: people on a metro train, and petals on a wet
branch, allowing the reader to connect them without having to be told that one
image is like the other. This ability to easily connect the two images covers
Lowell’s rule of imagism “to produce poetry that is hard and clear, never
blurred nor indefinite”. Pound’s two images compare two scenes that seem to
contrast. For instance, the line “The apparition of these faces in the crowd;”
(1) produces a dull, dark scene, whereas the line “Petals on a wet, black bough”
(2) is a more lively scene. Pound follows Lowell’s rules of imagism by creating
two clear scenes that the reader is able to mirror one to the other.
Lowell’s final rule
of imagism, “concentration is of the very essence of poetry”, is represented in
Pound’s work by his ability to present an image in just two short lines. Lowell’s
rule focuses on remaining on the subject of the poem, and not losing sight of
the image being expressed. By using the other rules Lowell lists, such as new
rhythm, freedom of subject, presentation of an image, exact language, and clear
poetry, Pound is able to focus the poem on one clear image. For instance, the
first line, “The apparition of these faces in the crowd;” can be interpreted as
a crowd in any possible location, but based upon the title, the reader
concludes that the faces are passengers on a metro train. The second line, “Petals
on a wet, black bough” doesn’t distract from the first because the reader can
clearly interpret the second like as a metaphor for the first, comparing the
faces on the train to the petals on the branch. The simplistic scene also
relates to Lowell’s rule “to allow absolute freedom in the choice of subject”.
I read a footnote in an old copy of “In a Station of the Metro” that I had for
another class, which talked about how Pound was so captivated by the unique,
beautiful faces on the train that he struggled to find the right words to
describe the scene. These emotions he felt capture how imagism allowed poet’s
to express any image they found important. In Pound’s case, he found that
fewer, more exact words captured the entirety of the image he wanted his readers
to see.
I thought that this was an extremely well-thought analysis of Pound's poem and that you made a solid argument for why it is a clear imagist work. Your comparison of the faces in the metro being as beautiful and unique as the petals gave the poem more depth and meaning and it was something I had never thought about before! If you were to expand this into a paper, I would expect a discussion of other possible ways to interpret the imagery of the petals on the bough. For example, could the poem be taking place in a different season aside from springtime? Or rather than seeing beauty in the people/petals, is there is something more melancholy going on with that comparison?
ReplyDeleteBrittany,
ReplyDeleteI was amazed with how you separated each word from the poem and applied it to your concept of a metro station in the springtime. I intrigued by your connection to the definition of 'apparition' and to the speed of the train limiting your ability to see someone's face. I can notice how Pound might use that word to signal at this image. It would be very neat to see you expand on your image of a springtime metro. Is there any significance to portray his metro station during this season? Could he be hinting towards a time period of regrowth? Overall, I really enjoyed reading your analysis and connections in this blog!